Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cees Mul's avatar

Thank you. I live in the Netherlands myself. Zero 'vaccinations' by the way.

I am 100% convinced that these so called vaccines do more harm than good. All the evidence points that way. Probably no need to convince anyone in this thread:-)

I am pleased to see so many people working with the data. But.... I am a bit confused. Here's why:

The website of the CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) which published this data mentions the following: Until this publication they considered people as 'vaccinated' 2 weeks after the second jab (Pfizer and Moderna mRNA jabs). They changed this definition and according to their website now consider people as vaccinated immediately after the second jab.

That means, people who die with one jab only are considered 'unvaccinated'. But when i look in the CSV link that you provide I see a description 'immediately after first dose' which seems to imply that they did count the single jabbers.

Have the CBS accidently shown more data than they had planned to share? I am a bit confused since I now see so many graphs and stats. For me it only makes sense when I undetstand the underlying data.

Expand full comment
DrLatusDextro's avatar

"Thus, likely given no efficacy, but proven harm, the entire rollout should have never taken place."

That is exactly what appears to be seen in New Zealand. Vaxx/never vaxx hospital deaths appear to be similar pro rata, while the proportion of vaxxed filling the hospitals escalated as numbers as the number in the population were shotted. A mess of confounding, but death in hospital reveals the absence of any utility of the shots. https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/new-zealand-moh-data

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts