Thank you. I live in the Netherlands myself. Zero 'vaccinations' by the way.
I am 100% convinced that these so called vaccines do more harm than good. All the evidence points that way. Probably no need to convince anyone in this thread:-)
I am pleased to see so many people working with the data. But.... I am a bit confused. Here's why:
Thank you. I live in the Netherlands myself. Zero 'vaccinations' by the way.
I am 100% convinced that these so called vaccines do more harm than good. All the evidence points that way. Probably no need to convince anyone in this thread:-)
I am pleased to see so many people working with the data. But.... I am a bit confused. Here's why:
The website of the CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) which published this data mentions the following: Until this publication they considered people as 'vaccinated' 2 weeks after the second jab (Pfizer and Moderna mRNA jabs). They changed this definition and according to their website now consider people as vaccinated immediately after the second jab.
That means, people who die with one jab only are considered 'unvaccinated'. But when i look in the CSV link that you provide I see a description 'immediately after first dose' which seems to imply that they did count the single jabbers.
Have the CBS accidently shown more data than they had planned to share? I am a bit confused since I now see so many graphs and stats. For me it only makes sense when I undetstand the underlying data.
The CBS report included one set of statistics where people were considered vaccinated immediately after their first shot, and another set of statistics where people were considered vaccinated 2 weeks after their second shot (or after they were otherwise considered fully vaccinated following a couple of different rules): https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/longread/rapportages/2024/covid-vaccinatiestatus-en-sterfte/2-methode.
A challenge Steve posted then pulled. I can't recall the exact wording but along the lines of showing how his data could lead to anyone's private health info being disclosed.
No, he says that I didn't demonstrate sufficient evidence that the information I disclosed had the potential to cause harm to people or their families (even though I think I did).
I told my neighbor grandma that I would start blackmailing Kirsch if he doesn't give me the reward, because there were a couple of things I could've told Te Whatu Ora that might have caused legal problems to Kirsch, but I told her that I had hesitated to start using gangster tactics so she's now making fun of me because I still don't have the money.
I asked Kirsch to pay the 25k USD reward to my Bitcoin address on January 29th... Its value would've already increased by about 18k USD, which is almost twice my yearly income. God damn philantropists.
The reason why Kirsch has so much money is that he never gives it away, unless it's part of some scheme where he donates a million dollars to Bill Gates and Bill Gates donates a million dollars to him, so then neither of them have to pay taxes.
I thought you did a great job on it and it was obvious you put lots of time into it. With the case pending it's a pretty sensitive time. But the truth should, I believe, always be put above anything.
Thank you. I live in the Netherlands myself. Zero 'vaccinations' by the way.
I am 100% convinced that these so called vaccines do more harm than good. All the evidence points that way. Probably no need to convince anyone in this thread:-)
I am pleased to see so many people working with the data. But.... I am a bit confused. Here's why:
The website of the CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) which published this data mentions the following: Until this publication they considered people as 'vaccinated' 2 weeks after the second jab (Pfizer and Moderna mRNA jabs). They changed this definition and according to their website now consider people as vaccinated immediately after the second jab.
That means, people who die with one jab only are considered 'unvaccinated'. But when i look in the CSV link that you provide I see a description 'immediately after first dose' which seems to imply that they did count the single jabbers.
Have the CBS accidently shown more data than they had planned to share? I am a bit confused since I now see so many graphs and stats. For me it only makes sense when I undetstand the underlying data.
The CBS report included one set of statistics where people were considered vaccinated immediately after their first shot, and another set of statistics where people were considered vaccinated 2 weeks after their second shot (or after they were otherwise considered fully vaccinated following a couple of different rules): https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/longread/rapportages/2024/covid-vaccinatiestatus-en-sterfte/2-methode.
Mongol, did Steve ever payout?
for what?
A challenge Steve posted then pulled. I can't recall the exact wording but along the lines of showing how his data could lead to anyone's private health info being disclosed.
No, he says that I didn't demonstrate sufficient evidence that the information I disclosed had the potential to cause harm to people or their families (even though I think I did).
I told my neighbor grandma that I would start blackmailing Kirsch if he doesn't give me the reward, because there were a couple of things I could've told Te Whatu Ora that might have caused legal problems to Kirsch, but I told her that I had hesitated to start using gangster tactics so she's now making fun of me because I still don't have the money.
I asked Kirsch to pay the 25k USD reward to my Bitcoin address on January 29th... Its value would've already increased by about 18k USD, which is almost twice my yearly income. God damn philantropists.
The reason why Kirsch has so much money is that he never gives it away, unless it's part of some scheme where he donates a million dollars to Bill Gates and Bill Gates donates a million dollars to him, so then neither of them have to pay taxes.
That's rule #1 with money. Don't give it away ;)
I thought you did a great job on it and it was obvious you put lots of time into it. With the case pending it's a pretty sensitive time. But the truth should, I believe, always be put above anything.
Well done anyway.