WHO is 10,000% controlled by gates and big pharma and is a loyal servant to germ theory. Therefore, I cannot trust their data any more than the data from the HHS. I know for certain that I have had no vaccines in about 50 years and no flu in over 30. That is all the data I need to say NO to vaccines and drugs.
The CDC is built to look at this same data….supposedly!…yet they are clueless….Why has the Trump Admin not received such deep dive info by the “experts” there??….Time to either get accurate and deep dive or we need to remove all and repopulate it with pro-citizen people….either they are with improving a needed or not vac injections and all the toxins within the vac.
Nice work, Ben. What would be really nice is to know what percentage of the measles cases were in the vaxxed. Suppose, by way of illustration, that measles cases will vary on a yearly basis among the unvaxxed. In this case, if 100% of the cases are among the unvaxxed, one could still find cases rise and fall independent of coverage.
Viruses have never been proven exist so why would squirting foreign substances in people's arms protect them from disease? It makes no sense to begin with and it's crazy how people can't see the obvious.
WHO is 10,000% controlled by gates and big pharma and is a loyal servant to germ theory. Therefore, I cannot trust their data any more than the data from the HHS. I know for certain that I have had no vaccines in about 50 years and no flu in over 30. That is all the data I need to say NO to vaccines and drugs.
When I look at Bill Gates, I see a demon.
The CDC is built to look at this same data….supposedly!…yet they are clueless….Why has the Trump Admin not received such deep dive info by the “experts” there??….Time to either get accurate and deep dive or we need to remove all and repopulate it with pro-citizen people….either they are with improving a needed or not vac injections and all the toxins within the vac.
Tonga and Samoa are very poor and not really developing. Tonga in particular is third world.
That would fit the observations here that measles control has more to do with development than vaccine coverage.
Nice work, Ben. What would be really nice is to know what percentage of the measles cases were in the vaxxed. Suppose, by way of illustration, that measles cases will vary on a yearly basis among the unvaxxed. In this case, if 100% of the cases are among the unvaxxed, one could still find cases rise and fall independent of coverage.
Viruses have never been proven exist so why would squirting foreign substances in people's arms protect them from disease? It makes no sense to begin with and it's crazy how people can't see the obvious.
Nice to see this revisited. Thank you
Is it possible some vaccines in the past worked but the entire system has now been hijacked?