42 Comments
User's avatar
Tess's avatar

Thats a powerful article thank you.

I watched a student debate at Cambridge University this past year where young adults were arguing the case for mandatory vaccines. They were terrified of measles and repeatedly referenced the Disney outbreak and one in Wales UK. I could not find any breakdown on vaccine status for Wales however I did find information on the highly publicised 2014/15 Disney Measles outbreak.

CDC published data to show 45% of the Californians who contracted measles were unvaccinated. The big questions ignored by media were, why did most children/ people, over 50% of whom were vaccinated, contract the measles if the vaccine worked? Secondly what were the outcomes from having had the disease, which in the healthy is a mild childhood disease, although known to be a harsher disease if contracted later in life.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6406a5.htm

Also despite my reservations about germ theory now and my zero belief/confidence that any vaccines are health promoting, I was interested in discussions on vaccine failure in the literature.

Reference to a study from 1987 of 98% vaccine coverage and Measles outbreak due to vaccine failure. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1646939/

Expand full comment
Colleen's avatar

There’s info out there about 2 Merck Whistleblowers in the late 1990s testifying to the failure rate/ break thru when they combined to the MMR shots ….

Expand full comment
Tess's avatar

Yes. The case is built around fraudulent data on efficacy as they used rabbits blood to present an elevated immune response for the mumps element of the vaccine.

Quite incredible and almost nobody knows. It was in 2010.

Expand full comment
Marice Nelson's avatar

The complaint was about the mumps portion of the vaccine. And in recent years there have been numerous mumps outbreaks in full vaccinated college students

Expand full comment
Tess's avatar

Correct. If any pharma co would do this with one vax why on Earth would anybody trust them with any single shot of anything. They are despicable from the board down.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Vaccines appear to 'work' by suppressing the bodies homeostatic system. In the case of chicken pox, for example, this leads to problems later in life such as greater risk of solid tumours.

Because a person experiences the symptoms of poxes, rashes and spots (and chicken, monkey and small poxes plus measles are notoriously difficult to distinguish-because there is no real distinction) it doesn't mean the vaccine has failed in means the body has overcome its suppression and is detoxing appropriately. https://jowaller.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/84259083/share-center?alreadyPublished=true

'Outbreaks' occur because humans aren't islands. When exposed to the same toxins or when in proximity to others, visual and other cues stimulate the detox response. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/some-people-say-we-dont-know-why?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
Tess's avatar

Sorry no offence intended but all vaccines harm every single time. Look at the work of Dr Andrew Moulden, Jeff Bradstreet, Toni Bark, Rashid Buttar…. All these doctors discovered the very uncomfortable truth and all these doctors are dead, prematurely.

Vaccines simply cannot provide health to a body which is already fine tuned to deal with challenges. The body does absolutely great until the point that the toxic load is too great. Toxic load, poison.

There is no safe or effective vaccine, they are a lie, every last one of them.

I am not trying to convince you nor debate you. You take your vaccines with gay abandon and enjoy.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Why would that offend me, I'm saying vaccines are always harmful? I don't think you actually read my post. I'm saying what you are saying so what is there to debate? I'm merely offering more substance to how they can appear to work.

I won't take any vaccines thanks.

Expand full comment
Tess's avatar

Hi Jo, my sincere apologies, I been at this too many years and sometimes I am jaded.

You are 100% correct I did not read your comment, I glanced at it.

My apologies I never intend to be rude.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

No problem Tess and no harm done. I’ve done it myself.

x

Expand full comment
Charlie DeSantis's avatar

Caitlin, absolutely, “the control of the narrative.” Yup, without it you can’t manufacture consent, dull sensitivity to deliberate national murders and unconditionally fund, arm and run diplomatic cover for about an ugly a genocide as the world has ever witnessed. Unfortunately, our propagandists are perhaps the world’s best. They make Goebbels look like an amateur.

Expand full comment
Julia's avatar

In Michigan, we doctors can not order a test to assess if illness is due to measles infection prior to authorization for the test from the health department. This is also the case for mumps. This is not a requirement for other viral illnesses. We can order a respiratory pathogen panel that will test for about 20+ different pathogens without approval from health department - but measles, German measles and mumps are not included in this PCR panel. The question is why.

Expand full comment
Dan Star's avatar

🤔

Expand full comment
CuiBono?'s avatar

Good question. What is the answer/explanation given by the health department? What do they present as their reasoning for this? Very interesting…

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Like "HIV" i don't think there is a 'reliable' PCR protocol for measles and mumps. This is because there are so many 'genomes' uploaded with such huge variation that it's impossible to pick one.

For 'HIV" the definitive diagnosis is made on presence of p24 (also found in inflammatory conditions, healthy and pregnant people,) and on whether one is a gay man, a black African or had mulitiple blood transfusions.

Expand full comment
Drew Skonberg,DC's avatar

Is that a real question Julia?

Expand full comment
coords1306's avatar

Awhile back I wanted to try to make sense of what happened with Wakefield and it dawned on me I should go look at the year to year mortality numbers for the UK and see how bad of a jump there was per the hesitancy he caused when he suggested maybe going back to individual vaccines. Someone please audit this but I don't think you can tell the years it happened at all. So all the outrage about the vaccine hesitancy and you look up the number of deaths and its indistinguishable from other years. I think these measles outbreaks are at the very least blown way out of proportion, but more likely propaganda.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Yep, the MMR scandal did not affect health or mortality because vaccines do not improve them, though they may harm them. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/mmr-and-autism?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
Amit Sade's avatar

What a great concise analysis. Just 2 days ago I had a debate with a friend who supports blindly the "vaccines eradicated all past disease..." narrative. He was unwilling to see the decline in measles decades before the introduction of the vaccine. Maybe this will help to throw some doubt in his blind faith in those injections.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

It might be helpful to start at the beginning. There was never any evidence that the smallpox vaccine was anything but harmful. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/lets-hope-the-monkey-pox-nonsense Injecting cow pox (mostly confined to milkmaids hands) did not prevent smallpox.

Expand full comment
Baya Lazz's avatar

These days it is not bias but specific instructions are given on how and when to diagnose measles. There has to be foreign travel to initiate an "outbreak" which is discovered in response to an "alert" to be on the look out for such a 'unvaccinated' person to blame. After that the cases have to be linked together and only within 'unvaccinated' people. They must further be 'confirmed' in a laboratory. This is totally different to how "measles" was counted in the 1950s. It is like the outline in a coloring book where areas with higher numbers of 'unvaccinated' people have more people who could be linked together making 'cases' in them exponentially more likely. Mike Stone explained the details: https://mikestone.substack.com/p/measles-magic

The anti orange juice movement refuse to talk about scurvy rashes. Between 2016 and 2020 scurvy in children more than tripled from 8.2 to 26.7 cases per 100,000. Symptoms can include a rash that does not fade when you press a glass against it and sensitivity to light.

Expand full comment
Andrew Hewett's avatar

Thank you ..... I have added a link to your article here -

Are "Liable Free" Jab-Killers causing disease with MMR v@xSINs?

https://hewettinsite.substack.com/p/are-liable-free-jab-killers-causing

Other interesting research on the Measles' jabs can be found here -

Honorable Dr. Wakefield vs. Brainwashed Pro-Vax Cult

https://hewettinsite.substack.com/p/honorable-dr-wakefield-vs-brainwashed

Is Measles Really Caused by a "virus"

https://hewettinsite.substack.com/p/is-measles-really-caused-by-a-virus

Measles & Mumps in the Long Run Improve Life

https://hewettinsite.substack.com/p/measles-and-mumps-in-the-long-run

Expand full comment
Aldous Blackwolf's avatar

Just a reminder that the mortality rate graph should begin WHEN we began collecting it as a nation - thats in 1900

https://dissolvingillusions.com/graphs-images/

It clearly shows a 98% reduction in mortality to measles BEFORE the vaccine was introduced. This point must not be lost by moving the graph 60 years into the future

Expand full comment
Tim West's avatar

There have never been any deaths from fictional measles.

Expand full comment
US Mortality's avatar

In that sense, it's attribution, too. All-cause is the only hard measure. Yes

Expand full comment
Rev Dr Don J TYNES MD FACP's avatar

Any death from measles should be investigated and the doctor or provider with the hospital should be prosecuted and license taken. 1. Measle is a mild limited disease only an issue in immune-compromised patientscompromised . 2. Vitamin A was used and is still used as a preventable treatment. 3. Measles IV IgG is the treatment for severe cases so No Deaths should occur in 2025 unless under circumstances of incompetence, negligence and malpractice.

Expand full comment
AC's avatar

there has never been a death from the vaccine, on the other hand, there has been millions from the disease.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Yep, 'measles' and it's deaths were aleady flattening before the vac and continued to do so after it. Two things.

a) 4, 8, 11 deaths a year are hardly a democide, more like income generation from harmful vaccines.

b) There is no measles and there was no smallpox viruses. These are developmental phases that in extreme conditions, and now very rarely, cannot be survived. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/lets-hope-the-monkey-pox-nonsense

Expand full comment
Abigail Joy's avatar

IDK what we're supposed to be looking at with the Cochrane study. Going from a 66 / 1,000 to a 3 / 1,000 risk sounds like a pretty successful intervention to me. And then only 1 / 1,000 risk with a double dose is even better. Why is this shown as a bad thing?

Expand full comment
Dave Heller's avatar

Why is there no author to the article?

I would like to share it but know it will be dismissed by my JABberwhacky friends with “US Mortality” listed as the author.

Expand full comment
Oscar's avatar

Will you send to RFKjnr? He seems to have changed his tune on MMR (not that I am surprised).

Expand full comment
The Hundredth Monkey's avatar

Has he though? He ran on the fact that he wanted vaccines to be safe (which he knows they can't be proven to be)

I don't understand the hate to be honest.

Expand full comment
Oscar's avatar

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99n18zlzg3o

No hate, just calling it as I see it.

Expand full comment
The Hundredth Monkey's avatar

That's fair enough if you are expecting RFK jr to go in to the department strapped with explosives, but unfortunately the reality is different.

It's definately worth being extremely skeptical of him and the department, but I personally will not throw the baby out with the bathwater as he has always maintained what he would do in office. and he's never said he will ban vaccines.

Expand full comment
Dr. Flurm Googlybean's avatar

What combination of VAERS vax codes did you select on to make the vax/measles plot? I seem to be missing a few entries with MM/MMR/MMRV. Or… are you including the nondomestic data maybe?

Expand full comment
US Mortality's avatar

I selected group by "Year Died" and these five codes. USA is selected by default I think.

+ MM (MEASLES AND MUMPS VIRUS VACCINE, LIVE)

+ MER (MEASLES AND RUBELLA VACCINE)

+ MEA (MEASLES VACCINE)

+ MMR (MEASLES, MUMPS AND RUBELLA VIRUS VACCINE, LIVE)

+ MMRV (MEASLES, MUMPS, RUBELLA, AND VARICELLA VACCINE (PROQUAD).

https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D8

Expand full comment
Dr. Flurm Googlybean's avatar

Found ‘em. I’m losing the multiple shots!

Expand full comment
Dr. Flurm Googlybean's avatar

Thanks! yes I do recover these numbers from WONDER — OK then I go see who got lost in the raw csv’s I have!

Expand full comment