The human genome project was a bonanza for pcr/gene sequencing machines, and R01 grants from NIH. It helped create the myth that scientists know everything about humans including down to individual, never observed genetic nano particles. Billions and billions made.
Constant failures on it being unable to resolve any real health issues or diseases only led to the need for MORE large scale sequencing and computer modeling studies.
By this time in history its sure looking like just another money making “scientific” hoax
'Structural analysis of sequence data in virology. An elementary approach using SARS-CoV-2 as an example' authored by a mathematician from Hamburg who wishes to remain unknown.
I am uncertain of the date of publication. I've had it for more than a year.
" A repeat of the de novo assembly with Megahit (v.1.2.9) showed that the published results could not be reproduced. We may have detected (ribosomal) ribonucleic acids of human origin, contrary to what was reported in [1]. Further analysis provided evidence for possible nonspecific amplification of reads during PCR confirmation and determination of genomic termini not associated with SARS-CoV-2 (MN908947.3).
Finally, we performed some reference-based assemblies with additional genome
sequences such as SARS-CoV, Human immunodeficiency virus, Hepatitis delta virus,
Measles virus, Zika virus, Ebola virus, or Marburg virus to study the structural similarity
of the present sequence data with the respective sequences. We have obtained
preliminary hints that some of the viral genome sequences we have studied in the
present work may be obtained from the RNA of unsuspected human samples."
"Yes, the author discusses this "perfect match" in the text, but they frame it as a suspicious anomaly rather than as proof of the virus's existence.
While the 0.00% figure itself is only listed in the table on Page 9, the author references this finding in the main text in two key places:
Page 4: The author writes, "Our longest contig showed a perfect match with the MN908947.3 sequence at a length of 29,801 nt".
Page 18 (Discussion): They reiterate, "On the contrary, the longest contig we generated (29,802 nt) showed a nearly complete match with reference MN908947.3".
How they spin it: Instead of concluding "The virus is real because the match is perfect," the author uses this perfection to argue that the data is fake. They claim that because they could only reproduce a perfect match for 29,802 nucleotides (instead of the originally claimed 30,474), the original dataset must have been manipulated or is not the true source data.
They effectively argue that finding 98% of the virus perfectly is evidence of fraud because they didn't find 100% of it—ignoring that the 98% "perfect match" mathematically proves the viral sequence was present in the sample."
I would like to go to the bottom of why that paper disappeared, but like McKernan, your arguments suggest you have not done any PCR in your life. Yes there are perfect matches to the primers in the human genome, but unless they are very close on the same chromosome, they will not amplify human DNA, that's a fact. Of course you don't have a single read of a 30 knt genome, like all sequencing it is done with overlapping fragments, so you probably have never sequenced anything to come up with such an argument. The whole human genome has been sequenced, 100%, and there is no coronavirus sequence in it whatsoever. So I understand you would like to claim it is all an invention, but the virus has been sequenced in countless labs around the world, the whole genome has been derived over 3 million times: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=SARS-CoV-2+complete+genome
I don't think there is a single genome that has been more sequenced than that one, so it is ludicrous to argue that there is an issue with the sequence.
You are right when it comes to the theory of (nested) PCR itself, however his would only be relevant if the sars2 seq would have been properly validated and sequenced from a pure or single virion isolate, which is not the case. I recommend you go back to the sources I shared to study.
Of course there’s no known viral sequences in the human genom. Because it’s a model not an actual representation of all human genomes (if such thing even exists).
Thus repeating a faulty method millions of times does not prove its validity.
What is this fantasy that the sequence of a virus is valid only if derived by one particular protocol? This virus has been virologically and physically isolated, then sequenced. All around the world. More than 3 million distinct isolates. There is no mystery to it, it is straightforward.
You don't seem to know that the whole genome of more than two million humans have now be sequenced... So we have a pretty good idea what is there, what is common to all these humans, and where their genome vary. We can even detect the admixture of a few % of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA, which varies with ethnicity. So 2 million genomes for a population of 8 billions, I think is fairly representative. And clearly there is no sequence for any respiratory virus in any of these genomes. So where does the SARS-CoV-2 sequence come from? From a virus that circulates among humans since late 2019, with a little help from ill-intentioned humans.
There has been tremendous amounts of fraud, lies, deception by all the "authorities" during the COVID p(l)andemic, but the virus is real and in fact it is the "vaccine" that is a bigger weapon.
False, the virus has not been physically isolated, in the sense that it was separated from similar material - i.e. when it comes to sequencing from other genetic material. CDC has personally confirmed this to me - check my above FOIA link. Also, C. Massey has several letters proving that there is no purified isolate.
I've demonstrated a pathway of how the sequence might have just been a semi-random combination of several endogenous (or bacterial, or other..) reads - thus the ball is in the geneticists court to prove that a single genome strand of RNA exists from 1 to 29,903 and is indeed found within the capsule of a virion. - This proof has never been shown.
The human genome project was a bonanza for pcr/gene sequencing machines, and R01 grants from NIH. It helped create the myth that scientists know everything about humans including down to individual, never observed genetic nano particles. Billions and billions made.
Constant failures on it being unable to resolve any real health issues or diseases only led to the need for MORE large scale sequencing and computer modeling studies.
By this time in history its sure looking like just another money making “scientific” hoax
'Structural analysis of sequence data in virology. An elementary approach using SARS-CoV-2 as an example' authored by a mathematician from Hamburg who wishes to remain unknown.
https://impfen-nein-danke.de/u/structural_analysis_of_sequence_data_in_virology.pdf
I am uncertain of the date of publication. I've had it for more than a year.
" A repeat of the de novo assembly with Megahit (v.1.2.9) showed that the published results could not be reproduced. We may have detected (ribosomal) ribonucleic acids of human origin, contrary to what was reported in [1]. Further analysis provided evidence for possible nonspecific amplification of reads during PCR confirmation and determination of genomic termini not associated with SARS-CoV-2 (MN908947.3).
Finally, we performed some reference-based assemblies with additional genome
sequences such as SARS-CoV, Human immunodeficiency virus, Hepatitis delta virus,
Measles virus, Zika virus, Ebola virus, or Marburg virus to study the structural similarity
of the present sequence data with the respective sequences. We have obtained
preliminary hints that some of the viral genome sequences we have studied in the
present work may be obtained from the RNA of unsuspected human samples."
"Yes, the author discusses this "perfect match" in the text, but they frame it as a suspicious anomaly rather than as proof of the virus's existence.
While the 0.00% figure itself is only listed in the table on Page 9, the author references this finding in the main text in two key places:
Page 4: The author writes, "Our longest contig showed a perfect match with the MN908947.3 sequence at a length of 29,801 nt".
Page 18 (Discussion): They reiterate, "On the contrary, the longest contig we generated (29,802 nt) showed a nearly complete match with reference MN908947.3".
How they spin it: Instead of concluding "The virus is real because the match is perfect," the author uses this perfection to argue that the data is fake. They claim that because they could only reproduce a perfect match for 29,802 nucleotides (instead of the originally claimed 30,474), the original dataset must have been manipulated or is not the true source data.
They effectively argue that finding 98% of the virus perfectly is evidence of fraud because they didn't find 100% of it—ignoring that the 98% "perfect match" mathematically proves the viral sequence was present in the sample."
Does the NIH keep all the samples of these 3 million plus sequencing?
Who has ever checked the samples?
Which primers were used and who gave the reference primers for the PCR use for all of the sequences at NIH?
Who licensed this use in the PCR equipment and who verified and validated the readers?
I would like to go to the bottom of why that paper disappeared, but like McKernan, your arguments suggest you have not done any PCR in your life. Yes there are perfect matches to the primers in the human genome, but unless they are very close on the same chromosome, they will not amplify human DNA, that's a fact. Of course you don't have a single read of a 30 knt genome, like all sequencing it is done with overlapping fragments, so you probably have never sequenced anything to come up with such an argument. The whole human genome has been sequenced, 100%, and there is no coronavirus sequence in it whatsoever. So I understand you would like to claim it is all an invention, but the virus has been sequenced in countless labs around the world, the whole genome has been derived over 3 million times: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=SARS-CoV-2+complete+genome
I don't think there is a single genome that has been more sequenced than that one, so it is ludicrous to argue that there is an issue with the sequence.
You are right when it comes to the theory of (nested) PCR itself, however his would only be relevant if the sars2 seq would have been properly validated and sequenced from a pure or single virion isolate, which is not the case. I recommend you go back to the sources I shared to study.
Of course there’s no known viral sequences in the human genom. Because it’s a model not an actual representation of all human genomes (if such thing even exists).
Thus repeating a faulty method millions of times does not prove its validity.
What is this fantasy that the sequence of a virus is valid only if derived by one particular protocol? This virus has been virologically and physically isolated, then sequenced. All around the world. More than 3 million distinct isolates. There is no mystery to it, it is straightforward.
You don't seem to know that the whole genome of more than two million humans have now be sequenced... So we have a pretty good idea what is there, what is common to all these humans, and where their genome vary. We can even detect the admixture of a few % of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA, which varies with ethnicity. So 2 million genomes for a population of 8 billions, I think is fairly representative. And clearly there is no sequence for any respiratory virus in any of these genomes. So where does the SARS-CoV-2 sequence come from? From a virus that circulates among humans since late 2019, with a little help from ill-intentioned humans.
There has been tremendous amounts of fraud, lies, deception by all the "authorities" during the COVID p(l)andemic, but the virus is real and in fact it is the "vaccine" that is a bigger weapon.
"This virus has been physically isolated"
I would be interested to see the source for this.
False, the virus has not been physically isolated, in the sense that it was separated from similar material - i.e. when it comes to sequencing from other genetic material. CDC has personally confirmed this to me - check my above FOIA link. Also, C. Massey has several letters proving that there is no purified isolate.
I've demonstrated a pathway of how the sequence might have just been a semi-random combination of several endogenous (or bacterial, or other..) reads - thus the ball is in the geneticists court to prove that a single genome strand of RNA exists from 1 to 29,903 and is indeed found within the capsule of a virion. - This proof has never been shown.